Jump to content

Talk:Quentin Tarantino/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Biased ref #96

Hello, reference #96 (in Controversies: The Hateful Eight) currently links to an article on Breitbart, which is an ultra-biased and conservative news site. The article uses phrases like "with an obvious eye on appeasing the black press" and calls Tarantino's protest "cynical pandering" with "objectively appalling lies about the very same first responders we honored after 9/11"; if that isn't blatant conservative bias, I don't know what is. If an alternate unbiased source could be used that is nowhere near as alt-right as Breitbart, then that would be great.  Bulldog73  Bark  03:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Quentin Tarantino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Quentin Tarantino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quentin Tarantino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

"Controversies" section

I just happened by this article while doing some gnoming, so please pardon the drive-by comment here.

First of all kudos to the regulars for handling the most recent outbreak of controversy with an even hand and with great neutrality! Given the subject matter and the level of emotional investment (on either side of the issue), that's not easy to do, and I think you've all done a great job there.

However, one thing that sticks out and you may want to try to address is the use of a separate "Controversies" section. Per WP:CSECTION, such separate sections should generally be avoided because they tend to give undue weight to the controversies. And while Tarantino is certainly a person with more than his share of controversies, he is primarily a filmmaker and, as far as I know, is primarily covered that way by the sources. So, for instance, why is the controversy over the type of films, directorial choices, casting, and so forth not covered in the "Controversies" section? Personally I love Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction, but dislike or am lukewarm on everything he's made since then; and (movie) critics have tended to have similarly polarised opinions of his ouvre. By singling out the stuff currently in the "Controversies" section its weight is unduly emphasised, for the reader, relative to issues more directly related to his filmmaking.

As I'm just passing through I won't venture to make too specific suggestions for how to handle this, but as an example, the Spike Lee spat could be incorporated into one of the sections covering either Jackie Brown or Django Unchained, depending on where it fits best (or "least worst") chronologically. The two sections on Thurman and Polanski could possibly be incorporated into sections on Tarantino's general relationship with the respective person. Not sure what his relationship, if any, with Polanski is; but the long-time collaboration with Thurman certainly merits coverage that could incorporate this latest controversy too (possibly as part of a "Frequent collaborators" section that contains actual prose and not just a giant list of people).

In any case… kudos on handling the latest controversy, and I hope the above was of some use for further improving the article. (PS. please {{ping|xover}} if you reply to here, I don't usually watch this page so will probably miss your response otherwise). --Xover (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC) [Edited to add a crucial "not". --Xover (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)


Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Quentin_Tarantino/Archive_5&oldid=856327347"