Talk:Puyallup Tribe of Indians

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Merger

I feel that the article Emerald Queen Casino should be merged with Puyallup (tribe) as their is very little information pertaining to the casino and therefore, I do not feel that it is substantial enough to stand alone. T. White 09:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see comments on Talk:Muckleshoot in regards Native American article standards; there is no way the Emerald Queen Casino article should be merged with what should be an ethnographic article on the Puyallup people/culture; and even if there were an article on the Puyallup government - which there should be - the casino is still a different enough institution to be a separate article from any government page, since the tribe/band isn't only (presumably) about the casino.Skookum1 04:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i find it extremely hard to believe that over 30% of Washington state's area belongs to the Puyallup reservation. That is definitely wrong data (the map image also shows a much smaller area.) Washington has an area of little over 75000 square miles while this article claims that the reservation is over 28000 square miles - gotto be wrong. If anyone has the correct data please act. Best! 21:40, 06 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.99.167.127 (talk)

There were some untrue statements, i changed them to the best of my ability, and added ?? next to the things i didnt know 100%.

Council

In regards to the question noted in the article of 'when did Herman Dillon Sr. become Tribal Chairman?', it appears he was elected in 2000^[1]. I found several references to Chairman Dillon as the current chairman after that date (e.g. 2001^[2], 2004-2009^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8]), and no references to other chairs, so I believe it has been continuous. Hopefully someone else will have a better reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added on 21:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

References

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to Move (round-robin title swap required). ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 February 2024

Puyallup people → Puyallup Tribe of Indians – Article is about the federally-recognized tribe/governmental body, not about the ethnic group. I am writing an article about the ethnic group specifically, but it doesn't belong in the same belong in the same article as the one about the tribal government. One article covering both things would be overly massive, and this follows the current precedent of having an article for the tribal institution and the people. PersusjCP (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). PersusjCP (talk) 22:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. If you have a plan for the articles, that sounds fine. Especially since it would provide more of a searchable history than if you cut-and-pasted the Puyallup Tribe of Indians material into a new article. Yuchitown (talk) 23:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]
Yup, I am working on it in my sandbox right now PersusjCP (talk) 00:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support to make way for new article. oncamera _{(talk page)} 11:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject United States has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I participated in the parallel discussion at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests and there has been no opposition to the move idea. I will complete the move shortly; after that the "Puyallup people" namespace will still exist in the form of a redirect with no content, so that will be the place for PersusjCP to develop the new article on the ethnic group. Thanks everyone for your work. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Puyallup Resvn" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Puyallup Resvn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Puyallup Resvn until a consensus is reached. PersusjCP (talk) 02:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] web|url=http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&list=H-AmIndian&month=0006&week=b&msg=z/PHXN3e1QnBGVZIYd/pww&user=&pw=

[2] web|url=http://www.seattlepi.com/local/37088_puyallup30.shtml

[3] ttp://www.puyalluptribalnews.com/ConstitutionofthePuyallupNation.pdf

[4] ttp://www.digitalarchives.wa.gov/GovernorLocke/speeches/speech-view.asp?SpeechSeq=645

[5] ttp://www.ssamarine.com/050107_PRX.html

[6] ttp://www.nigc.gov/Default.aspx?tabid=602

[7] ttp://epa.gov/pmdesignations/2006standards/rec/letters/T_Puyallup_Tribe_EPAMOD.pdf

[8] ttp://www.dshs.wa.gov/pdf/esa/dcs/tribal/DSAPuyallupFinal.pdf

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]