Talk:Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery
Appearance
A fact from Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Johnbod (talk) 23:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 03:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery by Nicola Pisano (1260) has a relief (pictured) combining the Annunciation with the Nativity, with two Virgin Marys beside each other? Source: *Hartt, Frederick, History of Italian Renaissance Art, (2nd edn.)1987, Thames & Hudson (US Harry N Abrams), ISBN 0500235104, p. 52; *White, John. Art and Architecture in Italy, 1250 to 1400, London, Penguin Books, 1966, 3rd edn 1993 (now Yale History of Art series). ISBN 0300055854 p.77
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Eshmunazar II
- Comment: I hope this can run on Christmas Day
Moved to mainspace by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 05:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
-
- Interesting detailed article on fine sources, offline sources accepted AGF. The image is licensed and almost a must for this purpose. I see error messages for the isbn numbers of two external links ("checksum" for Olson, "length" for the one below), nothing that would keep me from approving, but would look better without on Christmas Day ;) - I wonder if the images at the bottom could be arranged better, but same. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks - normally a bot sorts out these silly ISBN error messages - apparently the number as printed isn't good enough. If that doesn't fix it by the day, I'll de-template them. I'm still expanding and the images will look different by the day. Johnbod (talk) 18:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: I checked out the article, hook and image and will move this to the Dec 25 holding area. Bruxton (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks - normally a bot sorts out these silly ISBN error messages - apparently the number as printed isn't good enough. If that doesn't fix it by the day, I'll de-template them. I'm still expanding and the images will look different by the day. Johnbod (talk) 18:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)