Talk:Pterygotioidea

Pterygotioidea has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Pterygotioidea is the main article in the Pterygotioidea series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 19, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
September 25, 2018	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pterygotioidea/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Dunkleosteus77

Looks good overall, just some grammar/style things User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Any reason you say "eurypterids" instead of "sea scorpions"? User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly because it is the academic term used in the papers. I could add that eurypterids are often called sea scorpions to the lead. Ichthyovenator (talk) 11:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, you may choose to wikilink things like "basal" or "type genus" instead of "Asia" User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Ichthyovenator (talk) 11:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of saying "lanceolate" could you say "lance-like" or some such descriptor User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added an explanation of the term, it is used so frequently in eurypterid papers that it might be best to use it here? Ichthyovenator (talk) 11:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Who're Clifton J. Sarle, Erik N. Kjellesvig-Waering, Leif Størmer, and Nestor Novojilov? User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have added their nationalities and occupations. Also linked Leif Størmer. Ichthyovenator (talk) 11:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think, "Until a more inclusive and well-resorved phylogeny of the superfamily can be produced..." is necessary User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, looking at it that part of the sentence feels unnecessary, removed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 11:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's something not right with the source for File:Eurypterus Silurian Distribution.jpg because the map's not at the url and there's nothing on sea scorpions over there User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Odd. Should the image be removed? I'm not sure we have any good images to replace it in that case. Ichthyovenator (talk) 11:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it's saying it's a derivative of something called File:SilurianGlobal.jpg which got deleted (I assume for copyright violations), so I'd say it probably shouldn't be on Commons User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 01:54, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the image from the article and will go about removing it from other articles where it is also used (Eurypterus, Eurypterina, Adelophthalmus). I do not know how to remove it from commons but I assume there is some process for that? Ichthyovenator (talk) 12:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it for deletion (just use {{copyvio|Reason}}) User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 15:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ref no. 17 isn't formatted right User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better now? Ichthyovenator (talk) 11:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It'll pass User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 15:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]