Talk:Proposed bans of LGBT-themed books in the United States

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arkansas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies Stub‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Y Confusing title

The title of this article at the time of writing is "List of proposed anti-gay book bans in the United States"- suggesting that it lists proposed bans on books opposing the LGBT community- while the article itself is about "proposed bans of lesbian or gay-themed books in the United States." While most of these ban proposals are made by (if I may have an opinion here) homophobic assholes, this is a bad title for the article. Request move to a more appropriate title. Hppavilion1 (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree fully Hppavilion1. I also think it should be moved from "gay" to "LGBT", it covers books banned for featuring transgender themes too, without any real same-sex contact so "gay" does not seem like an appropriate title, (not to mention some lesbians do not identify as "gay" either).★Trekker (talk) 10:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's not actually what I was getting at - I meant that the title implies it's a ban on books which are anti-gay, rather than a ban on books motivated by anti-gay tendencies - but that's actually a very good point. Not sure what a better title would be though. Hppavilion1 (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean, I just added another point.★Trekker (talk) 23:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@*Treker and Hppavilion1: As part of my edits to the "see also" section of the LGBT Right in the United States page, I went ahead and carried out this move. The old title was extremely confusing. ElectroChip123 (talk) 23:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ElectroChip123: Thank you!★Trekker (talk) 07:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is ridiculously confusing and uncited

What does 'banned' mean? Under the First Amendment, a book can't really be banned. Do we mean they were challenged? When? Where? What was the outcome? Do we include books that were challenged in a single library or school, or does it need to be a wider scope? Are they included if they were challenged but left on the shelves? This article, as it stands, is almost completely meaningless. Bkatcher (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]