Talk:Professional development

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mamartin3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

--Strategic Learner 12:29, 27 September 2005 (UTC)This article seems to propound a point of view and is clearly in need of expansion. --Vincej 09:19, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I tried. I also removed the first sentence since it made no sense to me: "Those who use the term foster (wittingly or no) the impression that any work, no matter how menial or reluctantly undertaken, ranks as one of the professions." Comments on my edits are welcome. Janet13 06:17, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Janet - it seems that connection with that individual's quest for work improvement. I have also encountered some highly professional wait staff in, of all places, a fast food restaurant. Professionalism, in my opinion, is possible with anyone who works, regardless of their vocation or status. It's as much about attitude as anything else. Strategic Learner

Professional development classes aid in building knowledge in working professionals work styles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.182.1.254 (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I noticed that two merger proposals have been put forward but merger discussions had not yet been set up. I wanted to lend my support so I am putting this here. Also, given the similarity between the two proposals (i.e. merge from Initial Professional Development and Continuing professional development), it seems like we should be able to discuss both concurrently.

Support - Both the 'merge from' articles are of low quality and riddled with trivial information. I think the merger would be a good way of trimming the non-encyclopedic content. I also think that a single article will sufficiently cover the topics and make it easier for editors to keep on top of the subject. Cheers Andrew (talk) 23:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. FeatherPluma (talk) 09:51, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Professional development. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927010130/http://www.iirsm.org/become_a_member/membership_levels to http://www.iirsm.org/become_a_member/membership_levels

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]