Talk:Proclamation No. 216
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Proclamation No. 216 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Memorandum order or general orders
[edit]Kindly check the format for Proclamation No. 1081. This article has to have a section on its provisions or memo order/general orders to AFP/PNP, and all the rest thats not in those documents should be narrated under history or incidents.--RioHondo (talk) 18:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Most reactions are cons. Where are the pros which is most of he population. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.190.91.69 (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Move
[edit]From Proclamation No. 216 to Proclamation № 216 - using correct character – Nixinova ⟨T|C⟩ 03:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class Southeast Asian military history articles
- Southeast Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Philippine-related articles
- Low-importance Philippine-related articles
- WikiProject Philippines articles