Talk:Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes)

Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 15, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic characters#Big Mac|Big Mac]] The anchor (#Big Mac) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

My Little Pony Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject My Little Pony, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of My Little Pony related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.My Little PonyWikipedia:WikiProject My Little PonyTemplate:WikiProject My Little PonyMy Little Pony articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Animation: American / Canadian / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna review this. Stay tuned.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there a summary presentation of the main roles of the crew? Like "X wrote the episode, while X handled the storyboard".
- I don't really think this is necessary, because they can only be sourced to primary sources (either the show itself or tweets)
The part about Mary Jane Begin seems to have little connection to what was written earlier. I suggest first introducing the creatures outside of the Plot section, (e.g. "the evil dragon Discord") and making if possible a prosaic link to what was written before.
Isn't there some other review on these episodes? Even a third opinion would be helpful.
- There are several reviews from fansites, but I have refrained from adding those per MOS:TVRECEPTION. Pamzeis (talk) 03:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pamzeis: That's all.TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Brief summa. The article itself is considerably brief, but it still looks complete, since we're talking about two cartoon episodes with no huge cultural impact or complicated production. Passing.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]