Talk:Princess Birgitta of Sweden

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I propose that this page be moved to Birgitta, Princess of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen to comply with Wiki protocols and her own wishes. Yanksta x 22:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would comply to Wiki protocols if that usage for her wasn't almost entirely unknown. The Princess is known mostly by her "maiden" title, which she still retains. Charles 23:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any sources stating that Princess of Hohenzollern-Signaringen is her prefered title? If so, then I would have to go with that, even though Princess of Sweden is more widely known. Until that time, I say she should stay where she is. Prsgodd e ss187 00:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There have been no princesses of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen for over a hundred years; they are all just princesses of Hohenzollern. Noel S McFerran 14:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HRH

The court lists Birgitta as "HKH" * [[1]] which according to acroymfinder means HKH Hans Kunliga Höghet/Hennes Kungliga Höghet (Swedish: His/Her Royal Highness) * [[2]]--CSvBibra (talk) 20:43, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, you seem to be right so either they must have changed their policy in that regard or this was an exception to the specific instructions they gave me verbally about 10 years ago, when a friend wanted to write to her properly. They are not the most reliable or consistent royal court in the world. Will you add the ref or should I? SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead.--CSvBibra (talk) 16:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dame?

Pls see & comment here. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Princess Birgitta of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110827133900/http://sofiasvanholm.com/golden-wedding-princess-birgitta-of-sweden-prince-johann-georg-von-hohenzollern-married-50-years-ago to http://sofiasvanholm.com/golden-wedding-princess-birgitta-of-sweden-prince-johann-georg-von-hohenzollern-married-50-years-ago

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Explanation about the Succession

It is true that, under Swedish law, princes and princesses of the Royal House who are not Lutheran are excluded from the sucession to the throne. Birgitta and her children, however, would have been excluded anyway even if she had not converted to Catholicism since, under the amended Act of Succession, only the descendants of King Carl XVi Gustaf and Prince Bertil were in the line to the throne.161.24.19.112 (talk) 12:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She was excluded from deliberations about whether or not the amended act should begin with her grandfather or her brother. ~~Since she was no longer Lutheran, that matter did not even need to be decided.~~ --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did she become Catholic? All the article says is that she tried to become Catholic when she got married, but it was denied. It never says she later became Catholic. 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:35FE:5C20:AE7:97BB (talk) 03:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No she did not. Thank you for helping with an update here. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Dowager" unsourced

Unsourced dowager titles are being added to some articles and this has been addressed on the user's talk page. Time to stop adding unsourced info. Just because a titled woman is a widow does not mean she is known as "dowager". If she is, there's bound to be a reliable source. No source? No-no. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]