Talk:Pretty Girls Like Trap Music
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pretty Girls Like Trap Music article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Co-Producer Contributions
[edit]I am an entertainment lawyer based in Atlanta Georgia.(Redacted) My client, Rijhay Sampson, p/k/a "RE", is a co-producer on the OG Kush Diet track on this album. I have tried to edit this page to include his credits and it has apparently been changed. I am in the process of correcting this information with the label.
Another client, Sauce Lord Rich - part of the FKI production team, has confirmed RE's contribution to the production. My email address is (Redacted) and my office number is (Redacted).
I am willing to provide whatever source information necessary to confirm this information while I am waiting to have this data updated by the label.
Unfortunately, the label has been dilatory in circulating the producer declarations (an unfortunately common occurence) which prevents theses sorts of misunderstandings.Ahonore1 (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Ahonore1: If you did all those edits, my advice to you is don't be using multiple accounts and add a source to prove he co-produced the track. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- @TheAmazingPeanuts I'm new at this process, thank you for the tips. Let me know what type of source would be appropriate. I know everyone involved with this record which is the basis of my edit request. My sources are all primary documents, what is the best way to reference an unpublished document to update this. These types of omissions happen quite often, and it would be good to establish a best practice for correcting this. It is a copyright violation to omit contributors and the fact that another "source" may have committed a violation by omitting an individual should not excuse their omission herein - especially when they are making the publisher aware of the problem. Any input you (or anyone else) can provide is welcomed. Ahonore1 (talk) 19:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- You cannot use unpublished documents. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Ahonore1: JJMC89 is right, we can not use unpublished documents. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- You cannot use unpublished documents. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- @TheAmazingPeanuts I'm new at this process, thank you for the tips. Let me know what type of source would be appropriate. I know everyone involved with this record which is the basis of my edit request. My sources are all primary documents, what is the best way to reference an unpublished document to update this. These types of omissions happen quite often, and it would be good to establish a best practice for correcting this. It is a copyright violation to omit contributors and the fact that another "source" may have committed a violation by omitting an individual should not excuse their omission herein - especially when they are making the publisher aware of the problem. Any input you (or anyone else) can provide is welcomed. Ahonore1 (talk) 19:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)