Talk:Prehistoric reptile

	Prehistoric reptile is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't get it

What exactly is the point of this article? Is it meant to be a list of prehistoric reptiles? If so, it is so ridiculously incomplete as to be totally useless. And if it were complete, it would be so long and comprehensive as to be similarly useless. The article also explicitly excludes dinosaurs, which is baffling as they are prehistoric reptiles too. This should be a category, not an article. Dinoguy2 (talk) 23:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, but I did find it useful nonetheless. It might benefit from some revision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.53.138 (talk) 06:25, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]