Talk:Preca

This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anthroponymy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion

This article is gains most of its content unreservedly and without alteration from the society website, which means that it is mostly vandalized. This is evinced by the structure, which is identical to that of the correctly named George Preca article which was recently rewritten for having been vandalized and incredibly POV. This brings up a second issue, namely, that a better-named and better written article exists for the same subject at George Preca. Lastly, it is an orphan. See Talk:George Preca. Alekjds ^talk 06:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]