Talk:Post-truth politics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Post-truth politics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

A fact from Post-truth politics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 November 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Conservative Member of Parliament Sarah Wollaston switched from supporting to repudiating the pro-Brexit Vote Leave group, calling its repetition of debunked claims "post-truth politics"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Post-truth politics.

Wikipedia

European Union Mid‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom High‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possible COI editor, Jayson Harsin

Last year I posted a COIN discussion regarding a number of IP addresses adding Jayson Harsin based references to articles including this one. [1] This appears to be a case of an academic, likely legitimate in the field, trying to self promote by putting their name in Wikipedia articles. I'm not familiar enough with this topic to decide if the person in question is over represented, correctly represented etc in context of the number of times they are mentioned by name in this article thus I'm not going to outright remove their additions. I would encourage others to take a look. Looking at various additions of Harsin sources, the first instance was by an IP editor here [2]. This addition included name in the article text, not just references. Additional additions by IP editors [3],[4],[5],[6],[7] Springee (talk) 03:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are different IP addresses. Do we know for a fact this is a COI? DN (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, these edits are not all confined to Harsin's work. There is a procedure for handling suspicious edits, because under no circumstances are we supposed to compel a typical editor to reveal personal information.

DN (talk) 02:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a few months now, is there still a reason to keep the COI template in place? DN (talk) 09:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been dormant for months and the alleged COI editor has not continued making any changes. There have been no further requested changes so I am removing tag per #7 Help:Maintenance template removal#When to remove...If changes are requested or needed in relation to this issue, there's no need to reinstate the tag, just be WP:BOLD...Cheers. DN (talk) 01:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think some of the mentions/references to Harsin's work should probably be removed. I don't think it would harm the article overall. Springee (talk) 03:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]