Talk:Pornification

This page was proposed for deletion by ‪Narutolovehinata5‬ (talk · contribs) on 3 August 2015 with the comment:
Does not appear to be a notable term: i.e. an unremarkable neologism.
It was contested by MelanieN (talk · contribs) on 2015-08-10 with the comment:
declining prod; the term seems to be widely used. AfD remains a possibility.

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why should this be its own article?

I'm really not seeing why this should be its own article instead of merged with the Pornography or Sexualization article. Sure, when citing WP:NEO, one can argue that it's a notable neologism, but one can also argue that, per WP:No page, that doesn't mean it needs its own article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like a poorly written high school essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.175.194 (talk) 06:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that this article should be merged, per Flyer22 Reborn. -Crossroads- (talk) 04:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ه

Could someone please make this article better? Thanks, 184.19.98.82 (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse current redirect

"Pornographication" is not the correct term for the topic, which is pornification: the mainstreaming of porn.

Barton, Bernadette (March 2021). The Pornification of America: How Raunch Culture Is Ruining Our Society. NYU Press. p. 232. ISBN 9781479894437.

Currently pornification redirects here, but it should be the other way. --WriterArtistDC (talk) 18:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup after move

The entire "History" section can be deleted, since it is a history of porn, not pornification, which is a 21st century concept.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed history, which contained the OR and lack of focus, so also removed maintenance tags.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 23:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed content not related to cited source

Content that I had previously deleted as trivial and unsourced has been restored, with the addition of a citation that has nothing to do with the content, so I have again removed it. The new reference is about opposition to actual porn, not the pornification of mainstream culture.

I am sure there are sources that could be used to support content on the Evangelical viewpoint on pornification, but that would require thought. WriterArtistDC (talk) 02:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]