Jump to content

Talk:Pong Su incident

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SAS involvement?

[edit]

The opening paragraph states that "members of the Australian Special Operations Command intercepted and boarded a ... freighter." The Australian media have repeatedly reported that it was the SAS that boarded the Pong Su. The SAS is a unit within ASOC. Unless there is a dispute about this I intend to make the reference specifically to the SAS. Wulfilia 14:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Australian Army's service newspaper reported that elements from all of SOC's units took part in the operation. See: http://www.defence.gov.au/news/armynews/editions/1073/topstories/story01.htm --Nick Dowling 08:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incident Response Regiment

[edit]

I've just removed the statement that "Australia's Incident Response Regiment was also deployed, indicating Australia's suspicion of weapons on board." According to Defence media releases and news stories, the unit which boarded the ship was a rapidly assembled and ad-hoc unit comprising Special Forces personnel who were trained in boarding moving ships and available in Sydney during Easter. The IRR personnel were involved only because they were trained to board moving ships and there have been no reports I've seen indicating that the Australian government was expecting to find anything requiring the IRR's specialist skills on board the ship. --Nick Dowling 11:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections needed

[edit]

The following statement is incorrect:

"Then, in a search of the beach at Boggaley Creek, Australian police discovered the body of a North Korean recently buried close to a dingy. It is probable that the dingy had capsized while bringing the heroin ashore, drowning one of the North Koreans. Police also apprehended another North Korean in the immediate area".

The man apprehended in the immediate area was Ta Song Wong. He says he is an ethnic Korean from China ( http://www.austlii.edu.au//cgi-bin/disp.pl/au/cases/vic/VSC/2006/126.html?query=Pong%20Su ). And Australian police discovered the body of an *Asian man*. Who said he was a North Korean?

I wouldn't correct the article myself, because my English may be not good enough. I hope one day someone will read this story from original sources, not from newspapers. The sources are in part available here: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinosrch.cgi?method=boolean;query=Pong%20Su;meta=%2Fau;mask_path=;offset=0;view=date

There are more things in this article to correct after reading the aforementioned original documents. Though reading will surely require some patience.

--- Who the heck wrote the Korean alphabetization (한글) in this article? Without going through it, the Pong Su is 봉수호, not 퐁수. Further, the ship's political secretary is by no means a Mr 취, for that surname does not exist in Korean. It is 최. His full name is 최동성, rather than 동송. A a cursory search of the Korean news stories on this topic will turn up the correct names for all of them (whoever is writing this should look here: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%EB%B4%89%EC%88%98%ED%98%B8+%EC%B5%9C%EB%8F%99%EC%84%B1).

I have never been prompted to write anything on any wiki till now, but I feel very strongly that all efforts should be made to make sure that all spellings of names be correct, in whatever alphabet/script/characters they are written.

---

Fair use rationale for Image:Operation Sorbet 1.jpg

[edit]

Image:Operation Sorbet 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ship info

[edit]

Was the vessel built in NK? Has it had previous owners? What was its history prior to this incident? Drutt 20:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a ship built in Japan in the late 1970s that had had several previous owners. 118.209.21.232 (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 21:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ships name in Chinese?

[edit]

This text "「鋒秀」號 " was cut and put in the intro from a lower section of the article. Is this the ship's name? As it is unclear, the text in the article is hidden with editor comment.--S. Rich (talk) 04:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems irrelevant as the ship isn't Chinese.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - that's the ship's name written in Hanja (Chinese characters used for writing Korean, as an alternative to Hangul). Hanja no longer used in the North, but still have some official usage in South Korea. AaronRichard (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

North Korean government

[edit]
Most significantly, an official of the governing Korean Workers' Party was found on board, linking the drug shipment to Kim Jong-il's government.

I am sure there are no private shipping lines in North Korea, so the Pong Su was state-owned, like most of the economy (apart from co-operative farms). Likewise, the party is involved in many facets of society. This isn't all that significant.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pong Su incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

[edit]

The prosecution case against the four North Korean officers was that they would not have allowed their ship to be stopped in the position it was if they were not aware that the real purpose of their voyage was to smuggle the heroin. The prosecution did not allege any official involvement of the North Korean government, only the officers on board the ship.

What does this actually mean? Also I can't see any source for the statement, either. — M3TAinfo (view) 18:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense to me.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pong_Su_incident&oldid=1212866955"