Talk:Planetary habitability
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Planetary habitability article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4 |
Planetary habitability is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 23, 2006. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Planetary habitability was copied or moved into Terraforming with this edit on 28 April 2006. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
September 2005 – January 2006 |
Featured article review?
[edit]I've just chopped an unsourced section, but there is quite a lot of uncited text elsewhere, making the article non-compliant with Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. Wikipedia:Featured article review is currently working through featured articles that have not been reviewed in the last 8 years and this article is listed near the top. DrKay (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Astrobiology missions
[edit]I wonder if it is appropriate to include a brief section on some of the space missions (Viking, Phoenix, Curiosity, ExoMars, 2020 Mars rover), that had an emphasis in habitability assessment. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 23:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Planetary habitability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/roadmap/g1.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://skye.as.arizona.edu/~turnbull/HabCat.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geosc.psu.edu/~kasting/PersonalPage/Pdf/Icarus_93.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/roadmap/g5.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://carnegieinstitution.org/news_releases/news_0601_10.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Zones
[edit]The "habitable zone" is defined as water habitable zone, looks to be the only determinate for the habitability of a planet here. But, new measurements show there are other habitable zones. Planetary habitability for life must simultaneously reside in all of the 9 known habitable zones: water, ultraviolet, photosynthetic, ozone, rotation rate, obliquity, tidal, atmosphere, and atmospheric electric field.
- this would need a source. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Naturally: Maybe should be a new page Habitability zones? As there is lot of info on this topic.Telecine Guy (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Universität Wien, Habitable Zone, Isabella Kraus, January 18, 2012
Texas U. Habitable Zones around Main Sequence Stars, by DP Whitmire - 1993
Ohio State, Habitable Zones around Stars, by Prof. Richard Pogge, 2012
Harvard, Tectonics and the photosynthetic habitable zone, by Sleep, N. H., Dec. of 2009
space.com, How to Find Aliens: Follow the Photosynthesis, By Charles Q. Choi, July 22, 2010
Washington U., The Feasibility of Photosynthesis on Extrasolar Planets, By Edward Schwieterman
Astrobiology Mag., Rotation of Planets Influences Habitability, By Amanda Doyle, Aug. 7, 2014
astrobio.net, Tidal Habitable Zone, Jun 17, 2009
Harvard, Tidal Limits to planetary habitability, R. Barnes 2009
- Zones move over time. Reviews of Geophysics, The faint young Sun problem, by Georg Feulner, Feb 11, 2014
planetary.org, The Habitable Zone of Inhabited Planets, by Jaime Green, July 7, 2014
Explain the slang: habitable
[edit]I understand that specialists in a narrow field love to submerge in their own slang, but I think one role of the encyclopedia is to open the field to the public by translating the slang to a generally understandable language. To an average user it would be obvious that planet that is uninhabitable is unsuitable for colonization from the outside. That's the dictionary meaning of the word: a house is not habitable - you can travel there, but cannot live there. Reading this article, it implies that a planet that is not "habitable" (in the scientific slang sense) can be perfectly suitable for settlers. (Example? A huge star offers 100 thousand years stability, insufficient for "habitable", very much sufficient for colonization.) Is it possible to find a reliable source for an explanation that would clear this up? I volunteer to write the explanation, but I cannot find any source. --Kubanczyk (talk) 12:12, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- ♠While I'd take issue with "slang" ("jargon", perhaps, if that wasn't a bit pejorative for my liking), let me try & explain as I understand it. "Habitable" is "can be lived on without special equipment" (pressure suit, diving gear); "colonizable" (if that's a word...) includes planet (such as Mars) where either or both would be needed.
- ♠In the scientific community, the usage is a bit different still: they tend to mean "suitable for the evolution & current existence of a life form like us" (which is a desperately anthropocentric kind of bias...). TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 20:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Habitability ONLY refers to the innert physical and chemical environment. Therefore it is possible to find a habitable planet that is sterile and uninhabited. 98.100.145.6 (talk) 20:28, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- "Habitability has been defined as the potential of an environment (past or present) to support life of any kind." NASA ASTROBIOLOGY STRATEGY 2015
- BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Is a sterile planet at all likely to have a human-breathable atmosphere? If not, habitability cannot include the scenario of a sterile planet that we could colonize. Dysamoria (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Planetary habitability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160602235333/http://veilnebula.jorgejohnson.me/uploads/3/5/8/7/3587678/lammer_et_al_2009_astron_astro_rev-4.pdf to http://veilnebula.jorgejohnson.me/uploads/3/5/8/7/3587678/lammer_et_al_2009_astron_astro_rev-4.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070828084412/http://library.thinkquest.org/C003763/index.php?page=interview13 to http://library.thinkquest.org/C003763/index.php?page=interview13
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090826151945/http://quest.nasa.gov/challenges/marsanalog/egypt/AtacamaAdAstra.pdf to http://quest.nasa.gov/challenges/marsanalog/egypt/AtacamaAdAstra.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628175616/http://www.solstation.com/habitable.htm to http://www.solstation.com/habitable.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160602235333/http://veilnebula.jorgejohnson.me/uploads/3/5/8/7/3587678/lammer_et_al_2009_astron_astro_rev-4.pdf to http://veilnebula.jorgejohnson.me/uploads/3/5/8/7/3587678/lammer_et_al_2009_astron_astro_rev-4.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140702161248/http://planetarysci.com/ to http://www.planetarysci.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Mercury Past Habitability Reference
[edit]Planetary Characteristics: Orbit & Rotation: The two articles cited for a possible prior habitability of Mercury refer to a source paper that does not seem to mention life or habitability. Did I miss the relevant content behind a paywall? Dysamoria (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- One is a newspaper report and the other says "Metastable and potentially habitable conditions might have developed episodically or transiently within these crustal materials". This does not support the comment in the article so I will delete. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- B-Class spaceflight articles
- Mid-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- B-Class Astronomy articles
- Mid-importance Astronomy articles
- B-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance