Talk:Pinoy/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Succeeded "good article" nomination
[edit]This article has passed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of September 10, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Pass, all makes sense, and has not been invaded by cruft adding anons.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Could cover a bit more, but I'm not sure if there is more. Consider expanding, but I'll give you a Pass here.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass.
- 5. Article stability? Pass, stable enough for me. I'll be a bit looser since I've seen many other Pinoy related articles get vandalized and loaded with cruft and such but this surprisingly is good.
- 6. Images?: Pass. Helps demonstrate the terminology outside of the country, and all freely licensed too.
Hopefully this will make you a bit more happy. Great work, also whoops I used the FAILURE template by accident sorry, you passed— ViperSnake151 00:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. My happiness is indeed improved. -- Banjeboi 03:49, 10 September 2008 (UTC)