Talk:Pigeon statues in Wellington

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

A fact from Pigeon statues in Wellington appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 July 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that after a pigeon sculpture in Wellington went missing, members of the public created a memorial for it?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pigeon statues in Wellington.

Wikipedia

It is requested that an image or photograph of Pigeon statues in Wellington be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Wellington may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that after a pigeon sculpture in Wellington went missing, members of the public created a shrine for it?
Source: https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350255049/pigeon-pincher-strikes-iconic-wellington-statue-stolen
ALT: ... that after a pigeon sculpture in Wellington went missing, people of the city created a memorial for it?
Source: https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350255049/pigeon-pincher-strikes-iconic-wellington-statue-stolen
ALT2: ... that people in Wellington mourned for a missing pigeon sculpture in Reddit by creating a memorial for it?

Source: https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350255049/pigeon-pincher-strikes-iconic-wellington-statue-stolen

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Banana (2024 video game)

Created by Panamitsu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 41 past nominations.

―Panamitsu (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

This is indeed a very interesting article and the hook is also interesting. The source is notable and I don't see any issue in the article. The main issue is the hook itself. The hook is telling us that people built a shrine after the statue was stolen. But what the source given for it says is slightly different. The news article says "On Reddit, Wellingtonians mourned Cub St’s missing bird by laying flowers and candles at its former perch". It is not even a shrine. The reporter didn’t call it a shrine, the reddit post calls it a shrine and we shouldn’t take the reddit as the reliable source. So @Panamitsu: you need to edit the hook a little bit. Or you can propose alternative hook. Or search for sources directly mentioned it as a shrine. Then ping me and I continue my review. Mehedi Abedin (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mehedi Abedin: The source shows a Reddit post saying "Someone's set up a shrine for the missing pigeon". I've also looked up shrine in the Oxford dictionary, which says "a place associated with or containing memorabilia of a particular revered person or thing", so I personally think that it is fine to call it a shrine even if the source doesn't (directly) say it. What do you think? ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Panamitsu: Well I guess we don't have to be so perfect. Although I think that using the word "memorial" would be better. By the way, I am gonna pass this hook anyway. Mehedi Abedin (talk) 03:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

The hook is good to go. However if the promoter has any issue with the word "shrine" then they can replace it with "memorial". I am going to add ALT hooks here in case any other issue occurs. Mehedi Abedin (talk) 03:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan tag

I linked this article to the "see also" section of Columbidae, so this page is technically not an orphan anymore, but I'm apprehensive to remove the orphan tag in case that change gets reverted... thoughts? TheCoccomycesGang (talk) 03:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]