A fact from Photothèque (Luxembourg) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Photothèque(pictured) in Luxembourg houses photographs of the city taken as early as 1855?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
This is an interesting edit. If I understand the summary correctly, this article is not to link to a PDF that's openly available on the web because its publisher has some special arrangement with a copyright holder. Just what is this special arrangement, and just where is the problem? (Not knowing the answers, I reverted the edit.) -- Hoary (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]