Talk:Phenom (rock group)

Fair use rationale for Image:Phenom NLS2003.jpg

Image:Phenom NLS2003.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Added fair-use rationale to image. Achitnis (talk) 05:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Phenom Unbound cover.jpg

Image:Phenom Unbound cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Added fair-use rationale to image. Achitnis (talk) 05:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Phenom Unbound-header.jpg

Image:Phenom Unbound-header.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Added fair-use rationale to image. Achitnis (talk) 05:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Metro in Noida Sec 37 will be bild up the graves of thousands.So do we actually need it ?Can we actually enjoy something who has taken so many Lives??????

Hi everyone this is Rashmi and i'm so upset with the management of metro in noida .Yesterday only i.e 5th Feb i had lost my Brother in an accident caused at the site of metro construction in sec 37 Noida cos of the Pole they left behind in the middle of the Road which was barely visible.And while searching on Google I came to know that This was not the First accident that took place there because of their negligence coz just 25 minutes before this there happened another accident in the same manner at the same place .Will this be the Last case of accident????????????????? So Plzzzzzzzzzzz give me some advice —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.175.85 (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk page is for discussing the article in question only. Dontmentionit (talk) 22:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Poor quality

This article suffers from several issues, most importantly the poor quality of content, no citations and lack of wikistyling. I invite editors to clean up irrelevant bits and add citations where relevant. Dontmentionit (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Cleaned up. Ensure citations and notability if any info is to be returned to the article. Dontmentionit (talk) 22:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

You didn't "clean up" the article - you GUTTED it. The correct way is to tag it in places you had problems with, and then give it a few days to allow people who work weekdays to edit/update the article. I am returning the article to it's original state - please do things the right way, and don't let opinions get in the way. Thanks. Achitnis (talk) 02:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

The comment you left on my talk page was hostile. Please don't try to teach me the right way to edit Wikipedia, friend, I've been on Wikipedia a while. There is no OWNERSHIP of articles. Relax. Read Wikipedia:OWNER.

There is no reason for someone who wants an edit to the article to ask your kind permission before doing so, just because you created the article or whatever. My edits to the article were good faith. A mess of original research is hardly the right way to keep a good article. The question is - do you want an article or an advertisement?

Since you appear to have problems, the whole history section is pretty much OR, not a single citation and pretty much filled with "opinions". Wikipedia is not a forum to air your personal opinions.

I'll assume good faith and give you time to fix the article if you would like. Please add citations and remove the advertising. Dontmentionit (talk) 09:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Just as you assume hostility, I assume thoughtlessness. Understand that this article has had challenges before, including AfDs, which can be seen in the talk page archives. I don't claim to own the article, but I do claim that it was relevant at the time of writing, and others agreed. You didn't EDIT the article, you just lopped off anything you didn't understand, which was basically the entire article. Understand that Wikipedia is NOT meant to be US/Europe centric, and this article is about a well known group of its time in India. Yes, India didn't have much online coverage at the time, but things are improving. Apologies for not being as advanced as you. If you have issues with any points, show goodwill - mar those sections (fairly) with citation requests, and leave it to others to provide them. And FYI - had you actually READ the article, you'd have seen that the group ceased to exist in 2006, so what "advertising" are you talking about? Achitnis (talk) 09:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Firstly,, you don't need for the band to be active for the article to drip advertising. Surely lines like "the group went on to perform at shows and competitions several times each month, and developed quite a winning streak." without citations represent advertisement or at the very minimum a non-neutral POV. That's like saying "Obama was quite the brilliant guy in school winning many contests". Secondly, there are no talk page archives to look at. Citations requests are a seperate issue, I may as well put a citations tag on the entire history segment, which was my main problem with the article. Not only is it unencyclopedic, it is also lacking in NPOV and citations. What's more, it is fancruft. Since you have intervened, Do provide citations for the History section and cut the original research and cruft. Dontmentionit (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Achitnis, Wikipedia:Verifiability states, "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. The source should be cited clearly and precisely, with page numbers where appropriate, and must clearly support the material as presented in the article." Dontmentionit was well within policy in removing unverified information, and you should not have restored that information without citing it to reliable sources. — Satori Son 17:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Since this issue has gone unaddressed for over three years now, I have once again removed the unsourced material. — Satori Son 14:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Phenom (rock group). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070622002626/http://www.cc-india.org/?p=25 to http://www.cc-india.org/?p=25

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)