This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Please help provide sources when you get a chance. The idea of scheduling this page for automatic deletion seems absurd, given the zillion references to Loeb measures in the literature. Tkuvho (talk) 03:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am a bit new at BLP's but my understanding may be a bit off. As I understand BLP's aim to be taken to a very high standard of verifiability. I don't think the question is about his notability, The point is all BLP's are supposed to have at least one reliable source. This doesn't have any, currently, I am sure it will get some. The point is to protect the living people who the biographies are about. As far as the 10 day limit, that is apparently policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thenub314 (talk • contribs)
Thenub, are you arguing that this mathematician is influential, but not verifiable? Instead of citing regulations, can you use some common sense? Tkuvho (talk) 04:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think the policy of deleting BLP's with no sources is common sense. To be honest I am not really sure if he is influential, I have come across some of his textbooks before in my travels, they seemed like good books to me. On the other hand, I know of people who have written nice textbooks that are far from influential. Either way, the main issue at hand is that this page has no sources. Thenub314 (talk) 05:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
