Talk:Paul Rester

Could you please explain more fully...

Could you please explain why you placed the {{coatrack}} tag on this article?

As the most senior interrogator to offer a public account of his activities you don't think he merits an article?

His activities are controversial. It is easier than usual to lapse from policy when writing about controversial topics. I work hard to be fair when I write on controversial topics. I'd like to think I did an okay job.

I don't expect to succeed 100 percent of the time. One of the things I like about the wikipedia is that there are other contributors who are willing to try to have meaningful discussions with people they disagree with. Sometimes when those who disagree with me are willing to engage in a meaningful dialogue I realize they are right and I am wrong.

I'd appreciate it if you would be specific about which passage(s) trigger your concern, and why your concern was triggered.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 13:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Rester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704010907/http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/02/chief-guantanamo-interrogator-says-most.php to http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/02/chief-guantanamo-interrogator-says-most.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)