This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Paul A. Goble is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia
We are not here to advertise his blog. WP:EL says: (What should be normally avoided?) Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority (this exception is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies). The guideline explicitly discourages from linking to personal blogs. A link to his professional page at the Institute of World Politics would be a much better choice and enough. Offliner (talk) 05:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The question at hand is: what makes you think that this freak is a "recognized authority" on Eurasia?? In fact, there is only one citation in the article and I firmly believe that on closer scrutiny he would not even pass Wikipedia's notability guideline! Google Scholar shows only a handful of poorly cited works (and even those usually from 2 decades ago at that). This sums it up succinctly: the oft-cited “Eurasia expert” whose output seems to consist entirely of recycling stories from marginal Russian commentators . Indeed, his so-called blog is, in fact, only a motley collection of syndicated articles ranging from the ridiculous to the batshit crazy. There is very little original content there. So, the objection raised in this debate may be perfectly valid. Antikapitalista (talk) 11:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, I didn't miss that bit. The guideline discoures external links to personal blogs and websites, no matter what exceptions there are. If we can link to a undisputably reliable source (such as the institute) instead, then that takes precedence, and there is no need to link to his blog. Offliner (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you understand what the word except means? Do you understand the phrase exception to the rule means? In this case the rule is: no blogs are to be linked; the exception to that rule is: except those written by recognized experts. Martintg (talk) 05:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you understand the spirit of the guideline? Links to blogs and personal web pages are discouraged. Links to reliable sources should be preferred. Offliner (talk) 06:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's a silly argument. If we're having an article on Goble, then it makes sense to link to Goble's blog. Goble's blog is a venue of publication of Goble's thoughts, and as such, its notability is tied to Goble's own notability -- which is sufficient for him to have a Wikipedia article. This is also what the policy says. Unlike some other cases, Goble's blog is also a reliable source for Goble's assessment and opinions, so it would even be eligible (and attributed to Goble, naturally) for citations where Goble is, although, of course, it shouldn't be the first resort. ΔιγουρενΕμπρος!11:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is the only Goble interview after 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war I was able to find. Putting it here, the authors of the article may want to use fragments of it - Goble appears to be notable mostly due to this "Goble's plan", after all.
