This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
Hi, I really like the fact that we're not using bold to show which members are elected. However, using color is also not suitable for screenreaders. Not sure how we can fix that? Dajasj (talk) 10:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mostly tried to copy the layout of the 2019 article, and I decided to add the coloring since that article did not show at all who was elected. I did not really think about screen readers, so it would be good to increase the accessibility on that front. I am not really sure how exactly, though. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 19:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps we can add a "Notes" column with the text "Elected" for those to whom it would apply. We could also use it for other notes, such as candidates declining their seats or being appointed to fill a vacancy. Luxorr (talk) 19:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I really dislike "Notes" columns, because they get wide and chaotic. But maybe just notes such as done with Thijs Reuten is a simple solution. Not sure whether a screenreaders works with that? Dajasj (talk) 19:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do believe many readers might be unfamiliar with that term, but I do think there can be alternatives to the current situation. The list would probably be better if this feature of the Dutch electoral system (open lists) would shortly be explained in the introduction. "Preference votes" can be linked there, mostly removing the need to link it again in the tables. Alternatively, "Preference votes" could be changed to "Votes", as that would also be correct. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.