Talk:Parmotrema perlatum

Parmotrema perlatum has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 16, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Fungi: Lichens Mid‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lichen task force (assessed as High-importance).

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink: Herbs and Spices Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Herbs abd spices Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Stone Flower Mixup

Kalpasi is a lichen used as a spice, not a flower. Looks like it's been confused with Didymocarpus Pedicellatus because of the similar common names. I've seen Kalpasi called 'black stone flower' and 'stone flower'. While D. Pedicellatus gets called 'stone flower'. The botanical name for Kalpasi appears to be Parmelia Perlata

Sorry I lack the wiki skills to fix this up in the article(s) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.69.168 (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right. Now fixed, I think. --Stemonitis (talk) 17:25, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Parmotrema perlatum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Esculenta (talk · contribs) 07:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 17:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Well what a taxonomic history this species has had.

This is only a summary! Many more boring taxonomic details were left out, to spare the reader. Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have the common names all been invented since 1990, as it appears? Perhaps a date or two would be helpful here.

I wasn't able to find much else to add about this. Most of my personal lichen sources have been printed since 1990, so I'm guilty of common name recentism. I did add a bit about another historical name, "pearly parmelia". Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the phylogeny based on spacer sequences? Has only a limited range of markers has been studied to date?

For fungi, ITS sequences are most readily available when using genbank data in phylogenetic studies. "Borrowing" genbank sequence data makes one's phylogenetic study more global and thorough without the added cost of collecting and sequencing samples. ITS sequences aren't perfect for phylogenetic analysis, but they do a reasonable job in most cases. But of course, multi-gene studies are most robust. Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Photobiont' talks repeatedly about "prolonged periods" of photo-oxidative stress, and the second paragraph actually goes close to that topic as well.

I've tightened the presentation in this section. Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some very small copy-edits in 'Habitat and distribution'.

Good, thanks. Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Uses section is terrific: informative and genuinely illuminating.

That's the effect I was going for! Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might be as well to say that Mount Lawu is a volcano...

Done, and linked too. Esculenta (talk)

Images

All images are on Commons and appear to be plausibly licensed.

The soredia photo is amazing.

The pic of P. crinitum has a smaller species in the centre?

Looks like the "weed" lichen (Parmelia sulcata). Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[38] author1 is Paoli, Luca.

Fixed, thanks. Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot-checks I tried all passed.

Summary

This is a fine article and there's little that needs to be said here about it. I have only the smallest and most marginal of questions. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! My changes are these. Esculenta (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.