Talk:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Glass Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Energy Start‑class

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Eastern Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Advertisement?

I didn't read this thoroughly, but I was tempted to slap an {{advert}} tag on it. It's pretty neutrally worded, but still strikes me as a bit propagandistic. I might be biased. But it's hard to tell how neutral this is without any citations of reliable sources... Katr67 23:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As other editors have noted both above and with the {{advertisement}} tag on the article, the article read more like a public relations release than a neutral encyclopedia article. I have begun to remove the promotional language.

To begin with I deleted the peacock language of the infobox “Field of Research” parameter: “PNNL delivers leadership and advancements”.
I removed the entire “Missions and Core Capabilities” section because it was hopelessly promotional and would require a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic. A mission statement is useful as advertising and for internal focus, but it is inherently unencyclopedic. Perhaps there is something salvageable in the section, but I can’t identify it. (And although I expect it to be deleted, I moved the holograph image for now to another place.)

Other sections that need attention:

In the “Notable scientists” section: The paragraphs on Laboratory Fellows and Battelle Fellows are meaningful to PNNL employees, but these recognitions are not notable for our general audience. If the section is to be retained, the paragraph on external awards should perhaps be expanded, naming names and achievements.
I am not sure what the point is in the point is in the list of PNNL directors. (I assume that Ron Paul, Tommy Ambrose, and Leonard Peters are not the same people that have articles.) —teb728 t c 08:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updates and Corrections of Factual Errors

Hello! I am an employee of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and I have been reviewing our Wikipedia page for accuracy. Since the page has not been updated in several years, I was wondering how I should go about making the necessary corrections and updates. Could you help me with this? I want to be sure that I comply with Wikipedia editorial guidelines. Thank you! PRunci (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]