Talk:PLaSM

This article was nominated for deletion on November 24 2010. The result of the discussion was delete.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

History & Applications of PLaSM

Don't delete this article. Improve it. A "History" section would be interesting. When did conception occur? What were the circumstances? Who was involved? How did it evolve?

Also an "Applications" section. Please describe a few noteworthy applications?

Thanks, PeterEasthope (talk) 16:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an article or the website for PLaSM?

This entry in wikipedia is not written like an article. It is more like the front page of a project website with oneliner sections referencing the documentation or the credits to the authors. This must be fixed restructuring the text.

There is no mention about the interoperability of designs made with Plasm and other CAD software — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.201.74.29 (talk) 12:14, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Old version

The article has been recreated after it has been deleted a few years ago. The old version seemed better to me, though. So if no one intents to renominate this article for deletion it may be worth merging the old content into the current version. —Ruud 14:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Language or application/compiler?

It isn't clear from reading this if it is a programming language, or an application that uses scripting, or maybe it is a compiler and is conflated with a language because it is the only compiler for that language? Also, it is odd to mention there being a github repository without linking to it directly or in external links, but instead as a citation. The repository isn't a source saying that there is a repository, so it is not an applicable citation. It should just be a link.76.105.216.34 (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]