This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:26, December 19, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Do not re-list an article if someone has removed the prod template, instead list it on WP:AFD and seek a consensus to delete it.
The article is a stub and is to be improved, but there are much more insignificant articles n wiki.
--Koppany21:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
O.K. PL has 21 Precepts, but also has 21 Principles, which should also be listed.
.
The last change to the article was a matter of translation differences. I think it's better this way, but
the 21 Precepts were written in Japanese, so there isn't a big difference between "grasp" and "comprehend,"
for example. The business about a "way" for every "name" is in philosophical disagreement with the Marxist
idea of dialectical materialism. I'm not sure the religion is large enough, though, to warrant an extensive
investigation of its beliefs and activities. Wowest (talk) 05:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted to the previous version, because it was supported by the ref cited, whereas the change wasn't. You can certainly add a more detailed analysis of their beliefs, but you need to cite refs for that. I have looked for more detail and criticisms too, but got stopped by the lack of available refs out there. - Ahunt (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Once again IP editors have been changing the precepts without citing a ref. The cited ref does not support these changes. If you want to change what the text says you have to cite a newer or more reliable ref that supports the changes. - Ahunt (talk) 13:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]