Talk:P. P. Hartnett
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by Frotz (talk · contribs) on 20 December 2010 with the comment: Not notable. No references. It was contested by Joe Decker (talk · contribs) on 2010-12-27 with the comment: +ref, decline prod |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 21 March 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved as P. P. Hartnett per discussion below. (closed by non-admin page mover) Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
P-P Hartnett → PP Hartnett – As mentioned in the article, the old stylised pen name has not been used for 12 years, and PP Hartnett is now the correct style and used on all his books. Markremde (talk) 01:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- Move to P. P. Hartnett per name Peter Paul Hartnett. Wikipedia isn't a place stylisms even for DJs, this is a writer. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- Move to P. P. Hartnett - I agree with In ictu oculi. Make sure there are redirects from any other pen names. LadyofShalott 22:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- Move to P. P. Hartnett Having read guidelines further, especially the Manual of Style, I agree. Would you be happy with Peter Paul Hartnett, a.k.a. PP Hartnett. Markremde (talk) 12:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.