Talk:Outline of software

Reversed

(cur | prev) 00:41, 1 March 2014‎ Codename Lisa (talk | contribs)‎ . . (10,111 bytes) (-102)‎ . . (Reverted 1 edit by Asustua (talk): Rv/ external link spam.) (undo | thank)

I would like to know why this link was market as "spam" I have myself looked for it more then 2 weeks. When I started my company I was looking for best CRM software, with google it was really hard to manage it because of hundreds diff software, on this site I was able to see just a list with descriptions etc. I do believe it might help much more people and not waste their precious time (specially at begin of companies) to look for a software many days. If you do not want such links, it's a pity since anyway it is nofollow. I though Wikipedia is about help people not "spam" or not. I see I was wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asustua (talk • contribs) 06:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC) @edit @Codename Lisa, I am sure you have never started your own company, if you would you'd know how hard is it to find a software which truly fits you. Because of this, that I still believe the link do more help then harm I "undo" your change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asustua (talk • contribs) 06:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

In answer to a query at my talk page, I reverted this edit because it added an external link to softguide.com. Wikipedia is not a link directory where external links that someone found useful are added. Instead, external links must satisfy WP:EL and that would be hard to do for this page because it is an organized list of articles on Wikipedia relating to software—the article has some "glue" text, but it is not intended to say anything useful; it is just an aid to navigation. Hundreds of external links are added to articles everyday, and most of them are removed to avoid pages from deteriorating into lists of promotional links. If there is an important topic missing from Wikipedia, an article should be written about the topic rather than linking to some external website—see WP:WTAF. Johnuniq (talk) 08:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the answer, now I do understand why the link were removed. So for others, if for example there will be a site which is really good and helped me a lot and they will have a "article" about them on wikipedia then I can link some of the text to them, did I understand that correctly? Asustua (talk) 06:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes, linking to an article is fine. However, it may be difficult to get other editors to agree with a change as an addition would need to be consistent with the rest of the page. For example, there are no links to company articles, and I cannot see how it would help to add them. There are some links to lists of products, and to prominent individuals, but they are very notable cases. Johnuniq (talk) 06:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation the topic. Will help me a lot with others edits in future. Asustua (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines

"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 00:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)