Talk:Otto E. Neugebauer

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

I have added some publications "selected" from the bibliographies of books I had in my office. They aren't canonical, except the ACT, HAMA, Exact Sciences, and Astronomy and History books, so please feel free to add to, subtract from, or modify the list. Maestlin 05:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Otto E. Neugebauer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130329235445/http://library.ias.edu/finding-aids/neugebauer to http://library.ias.edu/finding-aids/neugebauer

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Distinct lack of references

So, it's 2022, and this article has accumulated exactly 1 (one) ref since it was created in 2004. It's really tempting to delete the whole thing except a one-sentence lede that includes his membership of the ICM, and that's from the man's own writing in 1937. Despite his highly significant mathematical contributions, he gets fewer refs than a 3rd division footballer from Belarus, a species of minute sea snail or a village in Iran with a population of 237. Most of the article's text was contributed by Tripodian, whose last edit was made in 2012. The article on Neugebauer's son Gerry (also mostly written by Tripodian) has the same number of refs, namely 1 (one).

What to do? If I were to delete every unreffed statement (it's really tempting and also encouraged), a whole load of outraged 'Pedians would descend on me and moan loudly. I wonder how many? MinorProphet (talk) 23:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]