Talk:Optically stimulated luminescence

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

QUESTIONS

How is optically stimulated luminescence used to date sediments?

I read the following on the BBC news website, concerning the dating of the human footprints in the Americas (article Footprints of 'first Americans' by Paul Rincon - link http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4650307.stm).

The researchers used radiocarbon dating on shells and animal bones in the sequences and dated mammoth teeth by a technique called electron spin resonance. The sediments themselves were dated by optically stimulated luminescence.

Is the OSL in fact a kind of photoluminescence ? It seems the OSL is a photoluminescence with the traps generated by the radiation ? Pls explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.164.133.69 (talk) 13:47, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where's difference?

Between this article and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_dating Maybe you should unite them? 62.140.253.6 (talk) 09:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is OSLs are used to measure radiation doses. Is it similar to the thermoluminescent film badges. Optical dating is a method which can use optically stimulated luminescence to date materials by looking at the total dose and then dividing it by the radiation dose rate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.226.142.49 (talk) 07:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Radioactive radiation

"ionizing radiation (commonly known as radioactive radiation)" Radioactive radiation? What a bizarre phrase, is this commonly used? Is it ever used? Mtpaley (talk) 13:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted that - seems redundant to me.— Wdfarmer (talk) 08:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References?

What are this for references? The first one can not be read, because you first need to register yourself and the second one can not be read because the link is dead. Are there any better references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.76.124.179 (talk) 15:41, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Optically stimulated luminescence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160103074951/http://www.livescience.com/44988-humans-dispersed-earlier-than-thought.html to http://www.livescience.com/44988-humans-dispersed-earlier-than-thought.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]