Talk:Operation Diver
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Diver article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Multiple definition
[edit]This is what the article says;
- Operation Diver is the code name for the campaign
- The Diver Plan... (was presumably the underlying strategy related to Operation Diver)
- Diver was the code name for the V-1
Assuming that all these applications of 'Diver' are correct, all three applications of 'Diver' require their own separate citations.
- 4. The section headed Aircraft begins;
Part of the area which the Divers had to cover was given over for fighter operations.
I really struggled with this sentence for a short while, until I realised that 'cover' was in this case probably a poor synonym for 'fly across'. In reality it is the fighters that cover this area, whilst the V-1s simply fly across (or through) it. It is also possible that this zone was described as a 'band' or 'belt', as in fighter belt. I suggest using V-1 instead of 'Diver', and finding plain alternatives for 'cover' and 'given over'(1), thus rendering a much clearer description e.g.
Parts of the south of England, over which the V-1s were expected to fly, were allocated specifically for fighter operations.
Yes, it is a lot more wordy, but for me it adds clarity. And if somebody can find a source that confirms 'fighter belt' or zone, that could be be included.
- 5. The V-1 offensive began... with the message "Diver, Diver, Diver".
So now we have the Germans using the British code-word to initiate their V-1 offensive? I don't think so, somehow.
I suspect what is meant is that the first sighting of an incoming V-1 was reported by the Royal Observer Corps with the message "Diver, Diver, Diver". Again, this is much more wordy, but far less ambiguous.
Summary; the original text is lacking any supporting citations, and my proposed edits are merely re-interpretations of that text; I am not offering any citations; I haven't read any original sources (well, not recently anyways). I hope this isn't a problem.
(1)Footnote; I tried searching for the meaning of 'given over' on the internet. It failed.
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles