Jump to content

Talk:On the Media

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

[edit]

Are the references currently in the article sufficient? BS24 (talk) 21:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are zero third party sources in this article and there's hardly anything on the internet about this show. It's an obscure radio program from what I can tell. BS24 (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add a references needed template then. BS24 (talk) 00:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll direct you to the 5 references listed at the bottom of the page. Not sure how you missed them. I have addressed your concerns so I am taking down the tag. M stone (talk) 04:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Five references are not enough. If we can't have a template at the top then I'll tag every unsourced piece of information. Add refs, put a template, or keep the tags. Make your choice. BS24 (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please try to remain civil here, and don't drop ultimatums on other editors. This is a Peabody award winning radio show that is broadcast nationally in the US, and has existed for 15 years. As a result, I don't think notability is a big problem. You've only been editing Wikipedia since January, this article has been here for 5 years. I think maybe you need to take a breath and work on something else for a bit. --Krelnik (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentially, "hardly anything on the internet about this show"? When I Google NPR "on the media" (note the quotes to narrow the scope) I get 308,000 hits! --Krelnik (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you actually look through the results you will see that there is hardly anything on the show itself. The results are just from On the Media showing up somewhere on the page. I am not trying to be disruptive. There are simply not enough references. Please add more third party reliable references and I will shut up. Until then, please do not remove the template. BS24 (talk) 18:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I beg to differ. If you use Google carefully, you can find plenty of stuff not on first party sites. Here's 600 links from Google News with first-party sites removed. Use the links at the top to switch that search to the web and you around 100,000 results. Likewise in Google Books, you will also find 384 results. One of those is a book from 4 years ago that has an entire chapter on the program and its hosts, I've added that one to the article as footnote 5. It could probably be cited in several more places in the article, there's a preview in Google Books for someone interested in checking details. Please make an effort to improve the article before tagging it. Incidentally, given your recent editing history and the subject of one feature of OTM's Sept. 3 program, I find your comment "obscure radio program from what I can tell" to either be a tad disingenuous or downright ironic. --Krelnik (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
These tags are very disruptive and inaccurate. This is a well written and well referenced page. Please do not add any more tags without discussing on the talk page first. The talk page is designed for discussing differences in opinion. M stone (talk) 20:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • RfC comment. I came here from the RfC notice, and I have not previously edited the page. If the question is whether there is adequate sourcing to satisfy notability, I would say yes. The show has won significant awards, which are sourced, and the people who are on the show have blue-linked biography pages. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on On the Media which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.rtnda.org/pages/media_items/2003-murrow-national-winners701.php
    Triggered by \brtnda\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on On the Media which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.rtnda.org/pages/media_items/2003-murrow-national-winners701.php
    Triggered by \brtnda\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on On the Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:On_the_Media&oldid=1227103034"