Talk:Old Serbia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Old Serbia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Serbia High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maps

Most maps in article do not show Old Serbia. They would be more in line with the article about Greater Serbia. Most importantly, sources do not discuss Old Serbia. That is the perfect example of WP:OR and WP:COAT.--WEBDuB (talk) 09:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A dispute about the maps, doesn't mean that you should tag the entire article. We can discuss a solution but you should remove the tags.--Maleschreiber (talk) 10:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a lot of issues. One of the “mythbusters” WP:CFORK and WP:POVPUSH, with a focus on the negative aspects of terms and events from Serbian history. It is, to say the least, POV and UNDUE. However, current maps are obviously policy violations and when they are removed, templates will be removed as well. They totally miss the point and show some other geographical determinants.--WEBDuB (talk) 10:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]