Talk:Object Desktop

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Notability

Not every single Object Desktop program is significantly notable enough to have their very own seperate articles. Only WindowBlinds and Desktop X seem to be notable enough to have their own seperate articles. All other programs only need a paragraph or less in this article. --Konfab user 06:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that many are not particularly notable, which is why I didn't bother to make articles for them - they are sufficiently served by the mention in Object Desktop. If you have questions about the verifiability of the information in the other articles, then that would be a valid concern - I'd suggest bringing it up on the article talk pages if that is the problem. Still, deletion on the grounds of notability is still not a Wikipedia policy, and I think this is an excellent example of why it should not be - the deletion of pages like ObjectBar will result in the deletion of valid information about the programs, as well as their history in skinning, and they will not be available as a base for when the programs become develop over time.

Put simply, what's the actual harm in keeping the pages? How does deleting them improve Wikipedia, given that they are already summarized on the Object Desktop page? It's not like having them around makes Wikipedia more than a nanosecond slower, after all. :-) GreenReaper 05:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like an advertisement for Object Desktop. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.204.195.137 (talk • contribs).

So fix it! :-) You should find that all of the information here is accurate, though, or at least was at the time it was written (it's been a while since it was fully updated). I tried to keep the coverage proportional to the amount of impact the programs actually have had in their areas - therefore, some components just have a mention here, while others have separate articles. It would be good for Object Desktop for OS/2 to have more coverage, as it has historically probably had more impact on its (smaller) market segment, but I do not have easy access to many of the resources for that. Perhaps an OS/2 regular could help out? GreenReaper 15:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WindowBlinds GT3.jpg

Image:WindowBlinds GT3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stardockcompanylogo.png

The image Image:Stardockcompanylogo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]