Talk:ORCID

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ORCID article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 28 days

A fact from ORCID appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 December 2009, and was viewed approximately 668 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) is a proposed DOI for scientific authors that according to journal Nature could be used in 'edits of Wikipedia entries'?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

Unique Identifiers (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Unique Identifiers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Unique IdentifiersWikipedia:WikiProject Unique IdentifiersTemplate:WikiProject UIDUnique Identifiers

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen

Open Access Mid‑importance

ORCID is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases

ORCID has a Wikipedian in Residence, User:Pigsonthewing. The role is described in Announcing ORCID's Wikipedian-in-Residence. Please see WP:ORCID, or contact the Wikimedian in Residence if you have any questions, or require their assistance in that capacity.

ORCID vs ORCID iD

This article (and also the ORCID website) lists both ORCID and ORCID iD, seemingly interchangeably. Is there a distinction between them? If so, then this article should ensure that that distinction is made and the correct form used in each case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.156.108.97 (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, this article's use of the two terms is very clear and distinct. Please feel free to cite any examples that you feel are no so. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good critique

Baglioni, Miriam; Manghi, Paolo; Mannocci, Andrea; Bardi, Alessia (31 December 2021). "We Can Make a Better Use of ORCID: Five Observed Misapplications". Data Science Journal. 20: 38. doi:10.5334/dsj-2021-038.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

incoherence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the first sentence in this article doesn't really make sense. Cuniform Grocery List (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]