Talk:O.b. (brand)

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 December 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Brands High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women's Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Requested move 17 December 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

O.b. (brand) → O.b. (tampon brand) – Per WP:PRECISE. ob is a tampon brand and only gets recognized as such. Current title is not precise. Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. WP:PRECISE actually recommends that disambiguators be used that are as ambiguous as possible (provided the same disambiguator cannot describe another existing article's subject.) This request actually aims to do the opposite. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Steel1943. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 05:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.