Talk:Northumberland Avenue
Northumberland Avenue has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Northumberland Avenue is part of the List of London Monopoly locations series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lead imagery
[edit]Observing some chatter on Ritchie's talk page, I just took a quick look. The lead picture seemed weak so I have tried an alternative which highlights the fact that it is actually an avenue and also shows some other characteristic details, like the 91 bus and the ornate street light. I notice that there isn't an infobox unlike, say, Trafalgar Square and Strand. Infoboxes seem quite suitable for streets as they would be a good place to put stats like the dimensions, numbering, postcode, &c. Is this in dispute? Andrew D. (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- In this specific instance, an infobox might add value with a map, but the result would occupy too much space on screen and collide with some of the images below it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- I take your point as the article has a good number of images and it always seems tricky them to position when you have so many. But, as you're doing these as a set for the Monopoly list, it might look good if there's some uniformity. It would be cute to have an infobox with some style elements from the Monopoly card, like the colour stripe. But custom colours, like infoboxes, cause too much excitement, I suppose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Davidson (talk • contribs)
- They cause so much "excitement" we even have an essay about them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- I take your point as the article has a good number of images and it always seems tricky them to position when you have so many. But, as you're doing these as a set for the Monopoly list, it might look good if there's some uniformity. It would be cute to have an infobox with some style elements from the Monopoly card, like the colour stripe. But custom colours, like infoboxes, cause too much excitement, I suppose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Davidson (talk • contribs)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Northumberland Avenue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218041625/http://www.independent.com.mt/news.asp?newsitemid=64511 to http://www.independent.com.mt/news.asp?newsitemid=64511
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130430135742/http://www.london2012.com/athletics/event/men-marathon/coursemap/ to http://www.london2012.com/athletics/event/men-marathon/coursemap/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130502180801/http://www.london2012.com/athletics/event/women-marathon/coursemap/ to http://www.london2012.com/athletics/event/women-marathon/coursemap/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics List of London Monopoly locations good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class Highways articles
- Low-importance Highways articles
- GA-Class UK road transport articles
- Low-importance UK road transport articles
- WikiProject UK Roads
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Low-importance Road transport articles
- WikiProject Highways articles
- GA-Class London Transport articles
- Low-importance London Transport articles
- WikiProject London Transport articles
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles