Talk:Northern brush-tailed phascogale

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Northern Territory / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Northern brush-tailed phascogale is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Phascogale tapoatafa pirata

In reading brush-tailed phascogale and looking through some journal articles I wonder if we should move this to Northern brush-tailed phascogale or to Phascogale tapoatafa pirata. Any thoughts? ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 07:32, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess IUCN's article indicates this is the latest. Should we use the "common" name? ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 07:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it's commonly accepted as a species now. The common name does seem widely used (as is generally the case for Australian mammals); most citations in Google Scholar also mention it. Ucucha (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]