Talk:Nikita Whitlock
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nikita Whitlock article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Nikita Whitlock has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 26, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Nikita Whitlock appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 April 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Nikita Whitlock be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Nikita Whitlock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 11:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Alright I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I usually provide updates to my feedback over a day or so, I will indicate once I am completly done with my review, you are more than welcome to start making improvements before the review is completed.
Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate (Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship) and a Featured Article candidate (CMLL World Heavyweight Championship). I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated. MPJ-US 11:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
GA Toolbox
[edit]I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.
- Peer review tool
- According to the manual of style measurements should not be plural, so "lbs" should be "lb"
- All measurements are in U.S. , please use a conversion template to also give a metric version. it's okay to be in U.S. units first but we should also include metric.
- Copyright violations Tool
- The only real overlap is terms such as "Texas Class 5A Defensive Player of the Year", which is only natural for an article like this
- Disambiguation links
- No isues
- External links
- Referne 4 is dead, needs to be addressed
Well Written
[edit]- I am not familiar with football terms but should "second team" be "second-team" and so forth?
- I think the comment on his suspension should include the fact that it was never announced why he was suspended, just to clarify that the article is not trying to hide something.
- "Ravens, but" does not need the comma*
- The sentence in parenthetis " (he had previously played during the fourth quarter of the Giant's final preseason game)" should be rewritten and actually mentioned earlier so it's a chronological mention.
- Sentence starting "On December 23, 2015" is backwards, how about stating he was injured during the game, THEN that he was placed on injured reserve afterwards?
- "phonebook" should be "phone book"
Sources/verifiable
[edit]- "An opposing team's coach called him the best defensive player he had seen at the high school level." - since that is basically a quote it needs a reference right after it, and it would be better to make it a direct quote to ensure that it's clear that it's one guy's opinion on Whitlock.
- His "College statistics" table seems to be totally unsourced.
- Cincy Jungle andBig Blue View references should list "SB Nation" as the publisher
- All references that link to a website should have an accessdate listed, even if you click on them today to check they are appropriate for the citation and then list today's date.
- Some sources list dates as "May 30, 2013" and other use "14 September 2015". They should all have the same format, I have no preference which way you go though.
Broad in coverage
[edit]- It is definitely a "football player" profile. I would move the peronal life up first and use that to actually introduce the subject to the reader - right now it basically leds the lead act as part of the article. The lead should summarize the article, but not be treated as part of the mail article Think of it as a trailer, it introduces the movie, but when you go see your movie you don't have to have seen the trailer for the movie to make sense. In this case I would move the personal life section up and give some background on birthdate, location etc. then go to the football career.
Neutral
[edit]- Seems to be, if I find issues during my second read through I will update this section with my final verdict when I am done with the entire review.
Stable
[edit]- Very short history, nothing jumps out at me as unstable
Illustrated / Images
[edit]- None - I know it can be difficult to get a free-use image of some people and the "non-free" options would not apply to Whitlock I think. This is not a deal breaker or GA.
@Ringerfan23: - I have completed my review, not a ton of issues but it's also a pretty short article as Whitlock is early in his career in the NFL. So I am going to put the review on hold to allow you to address the issues. I will put in on hold for 7 days, if you are working on it in 7 days I can easily extend that period of time, although if no work has taken place by March 25 I will have to close the review. MPJ-US 14:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
@Ringerfan23: - I saw updates done on the 18th, the day of the review itself, but nothing since then. I don't know if you believe you've completed all updates or not, please let me know where you're at with this. Since work has gone on I am not failing it just yet even though it's been six days. MPJ-US 00:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Should be done now.RF23 (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Ringerfan23: - CHecked it over, looks good to me. Giving in the Good Article stamp of approval. MPJ-US 00:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
IR terminology
[edit]This acronym needs explaining. Is this relating to injury reserve or injury report? Also, this needs a reference on the Wikipedia IR disambiguation page.Dogru144 (talk) 01:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class college football articles
- Mid-importance college football articles
- WikiProject College football articles
- GA-Class National Football League articles
- Low-importance National Football League articles
- New York Giants subproject articles
- WikiProject National Football League articles
- GA-Class Canadian football articles
- Low-importance Canadian football articles
- WikiProject Canadian football articles
- Wikipedia requested images of people
- Wikipedia requested images of people of the United States