Talk:Nifty Erotic Stories Archive

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 August 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

General low-quality of content

As a gay man I have to say that the vast majority of what I've seen there is laugh-out-loud funny, and not for the right reasons, or just eyeroll-worthy. This is not to mock the archive. It has a noble purpose and goal. However, people seeking to use the content there as a testament — an adequate representation of gay erotic thoughts — should reconsider that. I think this goes beyond the issue of more talented writers trying to make money with their content (and, therefore, publishing elsewhere) but that also seems to be part of it. What's the most unfortunate about it, though, is that it has been as staple of the Internet for a very long time and it's now becoming harder to find it. It's hard to believe but censorship is increasing as the Internet develops, rather than the opposite. One can't even find this Wikipedia result in Startpage normally because it's filtered by a so-called "family filter" — as if families are different than other humans. There is so much cognitive nonsense associated with erotica, like the XXX nonsense in terms of how this article is organized. "XXX" according to whom? "Pornography" is what? Everyone needs to challenge all the assumptions, many of which are archaic and silly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.233.2.200 (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]