This article was nominated for deletion on 3 November 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq
Why was my edit on the 14th of January reversed? I pointed out that it's not a "false accusation", but rather one which is to some extent semantically unclear. The video of the ad clearly shows that the claim is that "he didn't vote once in 11 years", and then segues to an interview with Popaditch, in which he says "It's misleading because I have voted several times in the last eleven years. Yes, there was an eleven year period where I didn't vote, but..." thereby confirming that the ad is in fact factually accurate.
In any case, the current version says that it was a false claim, which is demonstrably untrue. It's clearly a true claim, as Popaditch admits. Whether the ad is misleading is one thing, but it is definitively not false.
Further sources can be found here:
"Citybeat reports that Popaditch supporters were angered because they believed Filner misrepresented Popaditch’s voting record in ads, however the ads were technically correct. The ads stated that Popaditch did not vote for many years, which is true; however the ad omits to mention that Popaditch did vote more recently."
This article should maintain a neutral point of view, and should not be used as an attack space regarding the subject of the article.
That being said to state there was a controversy, is sufficient, to allege whether statements were right or wrong is taking a POV on the subject and thus violates said NPOV. If you believe that the controversy is noteworthy enough to create its own article, then you are free to do so. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the current article doesn't say that it is a false claim. It merely states that there was controversy when Filner's campaign ran the accusing ad. That's neutral point of view, because it doesn't make any sort of judement on the merit of the claim. I'm fairly certain that creating an ad for the controversy is not a reasonable idea. bahamut0013wordsdeeds12:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
