Talk:Nick Halkes
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Self promotion
[edit]This article was far too subjective and the edit log shows that the majority of this article's edits has come from one IP that has worked mainly on this page with the occasional edit on related topics. I took out all the boasts and superlatives to bring the standard more in line with wiki requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HallucigeniaUK (talk • contribs) 22:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
The same anonymous user 83.217.115.101 reversed my edits the following day, and then made further edits. This article feels like a vanity piece and is full of unnecessary information on the minutiae of his career, in far more detail than is needed. The new edits are written in a poor style, with slang and jargon that is not appropriate such as 'a cut which enjoyed a list rotation on BBC Radio 1.' Other examples of badly worded and excessive content: Nick harboured a desire to be more entrepreneurial however, and after many years at Positiva he joined forces with Ministry of Sound who backed his Incentive Music start up.
This article fails to provide a neutral point of view account of the subject but any revisions are policed and reversed almost immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HallucigeniaUK (talk • contribs) 00:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)