Talk:Niacin (disambiguation)

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Niacin (substance) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Niacin which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page is in serious violation of guidelines

I was concerned at the purpose of the image in view of the colossal mess emerging at this RM where the same image has been cited as is currently displayed here with comments as to what it shows.

Compare this to Wikipedia:DABNOT and wow, where to start. Arthurfragoso, you have edited this DAB extensively, comments? Andrewa (talk) 21:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Including images and transcluding templates are discouraged unless they aid in selecting between articles on the particular search term in question."

If you think it doesn't aid in selecting the correct article, feel free to remove it. -- Arthurfragoso (talk) 22:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see what this DAB should say (perhaps not in this wording, format or grouping):

Vitamin B3
More specifically, it can refer to any one of three forms of Vitamin B3:

It could also say who uses these names, if that is clear.

Let's also see what it should not contain:

There's no need to say what other names these topics have
There's no need to mention the history of these names

All of that and more should be in the articles.

And particularly, there's no need to say whether or not using naicin in any of these senses is right or wrong. Again, opinions on this (properly referenced) belong on the articles.

More to follow. Andrewa (talk) 23:58, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted to version that existed before the renaming discussion started at Niacin; any change here must wait until that is settled. David notMD (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. These edits were out of process. Andrewa (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]