Talk:New York State Route 15A

New York State Route 15A has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 12, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New York
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Change of Intersection Template

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 15:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 15A/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --P C B 18:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
There are only a couple minor prose issues that I have with this article. They are listed below.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
There seems to be a large gap in your history between 1939 and 2011. If nothing happened, mention that.
Done – T M F 22:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I will place the article on hold for these minor issues
I believe the article is now ready to pass.

Please explain in the article what's all this about two Limas.
- It's fairly simple: there's the larger town (or township) of Lima, and inside of the town is the smaller village of Lima. The distinction between the two is made several times in the article. I don't see a need to expand on it any more because 1) I believe it's clear which Lima is being discussed at all times and 2) it's a very common occurrence in New York. – T M F 22:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The highway meets Rush – West Rush Road at an intersection south of the community, at which point NY 15A turns back to the north, crosses over Honeoye Creek, and becomes East Henrietta Road, the name it retains until its northern end in Rochester." Maybe you should break this sentence up.
- Split. – T M F 22:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"1 mile (1.6 km) later, NY 15A intersects NY 253 in a densely populated area west of Rush-Henrietta Senior High School." I think "1" should be spelled out.
- It certainly looks better. Done. – T M F 22:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"North of NY 252, NY 15A passes under the CSX Transportation-owned West Shore Subdivision and crosses into Brighton before connecting to Clay and Brighton–Henrietta Town Line Roads by way of a grade-separated intersection 0.25 miles (0 km) north of the railroad overpass." This is another pretty long sentence that could probably be broken up. --P C B 18:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. – T M F 22:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]