Talk:New York State Route 120A

New York State Route 120A has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

New York

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in April 1, 2013.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 120A/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 22:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC) I'll get around to reviewing this article in a day or two.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Everything seems fine to me, except one thing: The RJL specifies a concurrency of the 120 and 120A, referring to western and eastern terminuses of the concurrency. That alone would be fine, but every other reference to the road in terms of its orientation seems to be in north-south terms. I appreciate that the short section might be generally oriented east-west, but don't you feel that might be confusing to readers? Is there any way to clarify the situation?

Furthermore, the concurrency is also marked with "(northbound)" in the notes column. Does that mean that the southbound 120A traffic uses a different route there?--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It just seems really hard to clarify that. I tried, but it doesn't seem easy to change given you already know that NY 120A is going east, therefore it would be west-east. I removed the northbound tags. Mitch32^{(The man most unlikely to drive 25 before 24.)} 21:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the northbound notes because NY 120 south never overlaps with NY 120A and thus the overlap only exists in the northbound direction.

I agree with Mitch that it's erroneous to refer to the endpoints of an overlap as northern/southern if the highway is physically running east-west over that stretch. – TMF (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An explanatory note then perhaps?--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing the need for one. – TMF (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. After all, the prose explains the situation. Nice article.--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]