This article was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2019. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
I don't see anything that justifies this Page's existence. She doesn't seem particularly notable or significant to warrant an entry. It isn't clear since it just lists where she was born and that she got a PhD and is a professor. That seems like a low bar all things considered, but I'm admittedly not too familiar with her, so maybe I'm missing something. Rs180216 (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
She is the chair of the Division of Engineering Science, one of the most reputed programs in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto, which is Canada’s #1 engineering school; that itself is a pretty big deal. Additionally, her work in interconnecting cores on a single die is extremely relevant to modern microprocessor design to increase processor efficiency, especially in SoCs like Apple’s various microprocessors for their devices. She also has contributions in on-chip neural network implementations, which is also significant. The article is poorly written - it looks like someone started it and then never finished - but that doesn’t negate its existence. You could’ve easily searched this up by searching “Natalie Enright Jerger work” or something. ArnavTalwani (talk) 13:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]