This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I'll withdraw my support for the move as nominator now that the other (entertainer, born XX) has been redirected. Don't love (entertainer) generally, but it apparently has currency in South Korean titles. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 16:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think it’s worth doing a complicated disambiguation on Nana (entertainer) just because “rapper” is a type of “entertainer”, even though between it and Nana (rapper), the entertainer receives 90% of the views?
I’d venture to guess that very few people might end up here thinking they’re going to the rapper’s article, and if they do a hatnote would work perfectly to help them out. RachelTensions (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I think if you have to add a parenthetical to an article title, you might as well include enough information in that parenthetical to make it fully unambiguous. I see the argument you're making as a form of special pleading that should be discounted. That's usually not what the community consensus is, but I'm entitled to express that thought anyway. * Pppery *it has begun...16:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait: Nana (entertainer, born 2001) is currently at AfD for (IMO) failing to establish WP:BANDMEMBER. If the result of that AfD is to keep the article, then I would suggest moving Nana (entertainer, born 2001) to Nana (singer) as a cleaner alternative to using a double disambiguation, because, based on the very limited prose in the article and my general knowledge of K-pop, it seems like acting is more of a small side gig for her and her girl group activities are her primary function as an "entertainer" RachelTensions (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'd say that having 10x the number of views as the other entertainers would put her as the WP:PRITOP (for entertainers with the name), it can be expected that she is the entertainer people are looking for. Why clutter the disambiguation? orangesclub🍊04:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
10x is rather low for partial disambiguation per generally-accepted standards. It's been seen in a few other cases, but the consensus breakpoint is closer to 50x or 100x. * Pppery *it has begun...18:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as not ambiguous. (I suppose sometimes a significant redirect can create ambiguity, but no indication the other Nana is that level.) SnowFire (talk) 02:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
