Talk:NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

Weather Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename & Move

I've moved this page back to the title "NOAA Corps". This is in line with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names), which states that articles should be at the title that a random user would be most likely to think of. No one would ever expand the "NOAA" acronym when referring to the NOAA Corps. Isomorphic 06:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm placing the move tag here because an article's title should bear the full name of what the article is discussing. Paul 03:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). Wikipedia convention has always been to use the most common name as the article title, not the most correct or fullest name. Hence we have "Jimmy Carter" rather than "James Earl Carter, Jr.." If you disagree with this convention, you'll need to raise it in a broader forum than the talk page of one article. Isomorphic 21:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Undecided At first I agreed with Isomorphic's original comment. But then when I thought about how USMC is a redirect to United States Marine Corps, I realized it was opposite. As long as there is an article and a redirect, I'm good to go. -- MrDolomite | Talk 03:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the NOAA Corps name to it full Federal government agency name to help people clearify that "NOAA" actually stands for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the make sure the acrnym isn't mistaken for the actual name and not National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Corps. Neovu79 (talk) 04:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the redirect NOAA Corps still points to the article, which it does, that works for me. — MrDolomite • Talk 16:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Organization

Heh, sorry for the edits of this section. From what I can find, the highest authorized rank for the NOAA Corps is vice admiral [1]. But, the current NOAA directives appendix 1.1 dated Nov 25, 2003, puts the rank of the Director NOAA Corps as rear admiral (uppper half). I guess this makes him feel like he has room for promotion. :-) Seriously though, any improvemnts on how to organize/cite this info are welcome -- MrDolomite | Talk 02:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of pertinent information

Reading this article the following is the only actual relevant information regarding the NOAACC: "The NOAA Corps today provides a cadre of professionals trained in engineering, earth sciences, oceanography, meteorology, fisheries science, and other related disciplines. Officers operate ships, fly aircraft, manage research projects, conduct diving operations, and serve in staff positions throughout NOAA."

This is weak. I still don't understand what the NOAACC does. If anyone every spends the time to edit or improve this article they should start with actually discussing what the **** the NOACC is and does for the US. Beam 22:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of complaining about it, why not take your own advice and help improve it? Neovu79 (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

This article does not explain the very first thing that a reader would want to know: what is the purpose of this organization? Why does it exist? Why does a scientific agency have a pseudo-military arm? 121a0012 (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130806174518/http://www.publicaffairs.noaa.gov/pr95/may95/stubble.html to http://www.publicaffairs.noaa.gov/pr95/may95/stubble.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]